Sunday, December 15, 2013

Critical Context-Essay

Essay: Reading Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies as a Short Story Cycle                                By: Noelle Brada-Williams

            In this essay, Brada-Williams makes the point that Jhumpa Lahiri’s book is not simply just a bunch of differing stories within the same book, but a collection of stories that are woven together through unifying themes and the balancing act of “the most important theme running throughout the cycle” (Brada-Williams 456)- care and neglect.
            Brada-Williams makes note that marriage is one of the most common and easily noticed themes within Lahiri’s book. Though it is in various types and forms, this is easily noticed in all of the stories. To name a few, “A Temporary Matter” has a broken marriage, “Sexy” has two marriages effected by affairs, and the final story “The Third and Final Continent” has a long marriage made strong by their new lives in America. Along with this, we see the balancing act, as well. As there is a mixture between good and bad marriages throughout the book. This element and theme of marriage relates to Brada-Williams’ main focus on the balancing of care and carelessness that goes across all of the stories.
            Brada-Williams focuses much of her essay on the balancing of care and carelessness/neglect, along with the representations of each throughout the stories. Brada-Williams writes of these images/representations stating, “Such images serve as augurs of the characters’ emotional states and processes” (Brada-Williams 456). For example, as carelessness/neglect is seen in the way the Das children are treated by their parents in “The Interpreter of Maladies”, along with the dying plant and marriage in “A Temporary Matter.” Both show the characters’ state of mind, as Mrs. Das is unhappy with her life, and Shoba and Shukumar are so grief stricken they forgot to take care of something as simple as watering a plant. These acts of carelessness are balanced by the care in “Mrs. Sen” and “The Treatment of Bibi Haldar”. In “Mrs. Sen”, Mrs. Sen takes great care of Eliot, not letting him out of her sight as she cuts vegetables. Whereas in “The Treatment of Bibi Haldar” the women of the community rally around Bibi to care for her and find her a husband.
Overall, I found Brada-Williams’ essay very interesting. I agree with everything that Brada-Williams makes note of in her essay. After having gone through the stories again after reading this essay, it is easy to see how all the stories share common elements and themes, and how the author created the balancing of such themes from story to story.  It wasn’t quite until I read her essay that I could really see the balancing act that the author created in her book. At the very end of the essay Brada-Williams makes a really great point in regards to reading Lahiri’s novel, which states, “We are given the freedom to create our own closure, and in many cases our own judgments as to the outcomes suggested by Lahiri’s narratives. But with this freedom comes our responsibility to read with care” (Brada-Williams 463). For if readers don’t take this into consideration, they may miss the bigger the picture and may not take or learn anything from the stories. In the end it’s up to the reader to interpret the maladies.
 
Brada-Williams, Noelle. "Reading Jhumpa Lahiri's Interpreter of Maladies as a Short Story Cycle." MELUS 3/4 29 2004. 452-464. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment